Diff for "Campaign Selection Vote, 2025"

Differences between revisions 1 and 3 (spanning 2 versions)

(WORK IN PROGRESS - PROPOSALS WILL BE SOLICITED ON 1 AUGUST) This page describes the results of HICU-RPG's vote on the next mainline campaign the group will play. HICU-RPG chooses campaign to play based on player voting, and since 2021 the candidate campaigns/GMs are determined by an open proposal process. Episodic campaigns are selected separately. In 2025, campaigns were proposed:

Campaign	Setting	GM
Name	Genre/Setting	GM

Results

1st Place / Winner	TBD
2nd Place	TBD
3rd Place	TBD

The voting system used was cloneproof Schwartz sequential dropping, i.e. Schulze Voting, which satisfies the Condorcet criterion; in the event of a tie, the tie will be broken by comparing the Borda Count of the candidates.

Enthusiasm Data

This data is about how voters marked their enthusiasm about the proposed campaigns. It is non-binding with respect to campaign choice, but is here for feedback for GM-candidates. (It is the prerogative of a GM candidate to choose to withdraw a candidate campaign from consideration after voting closes, in which case the next runner up would be selected. For example, if a campaign that one or more people says they "would not play" is selected, it would be up to the GM-elect to decide whether or not to withdraw their offering on that basis.)

Campaign	Would Not Play	Uninterested	Somewhat Enthusiastic	Very Enthusiastic
X	?%	?%	?%	?%

Alternate Voting System Results

This is non-binding except in the event of a tie, but presented for interest.

Borda Count

Borda Count:
0: X 99 (WINNER)

-  ⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2025-07-28 14:11:54 → 
  Size: 1504
  Editor: Bryce
  Comment:
+   ← Revision 3 as of 2025-07-28 14:14:31 → ⇥
  Size: 1742
  Editor: Bryce
  Comment:
-Deletions are marked like this.
+Additions are marked like this.
 Line 18:
-The voting system used was cloneproof Schwartz sequential dropping, i.e. Schulze Voting, which satisfies the Condorcet criterion; in the event of a tie, the tie will be broken by comparing the Borda Count of the candidates.
+The voting system used was cloneproof Schwartz sequential dropping, i.e. [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schulze_method|Schulze Voting]], which satisfies the Condorcet criterion; in the event of a tie, the tie will be broken by comparing the Borda Count of the candidates.
 Line 21:
-This data is about how voters marked their enthusiasm about the proposed campaigns. It is non-binding with respect to campaign choice, but is here for feedback for GM-candidates. (It is the prerogative of a GM candidate to choose to withdraw a candidate campaign from consideration after voting closes, in which case the next runner up would be selected.)
+This data is about how voters marked their enthusiasm about the proposed campaigns. It is non-binding with respect to campaign choice, but is here for feedback for GM-candidates. (It is the prerogative of a GM candidate to choose to withdraw a candidate campaign from consideration after voting closes, in which case the next runner up would be selected. For example, if a campaign that one or more people says they "would not play" is selected, it would be up to the GM-elect to decide whether or not to withdraw their offering on that basis.)